Disgraced Scots surgeon Ian Paterson ‘divisive’ and difficult, inquest hears

Disgraced Scottish surgeon Ian Paterson has been described as a “divisive character” who was difficult to work with, an inquest has heard. Consultant surgeon Alan Jewkes, who retired in 2019, testified at the judge-led inquest that he had never directly worked with Paterson. Jewkes replaced Paterson as a surgeon at Good Hope Hospital in Sutton Coldfield in 1998 when Paterson moved to Solihull Hospital.

Paterson is currently serving a 20-year sentence for wounding and is the subject of over 60 patient death investigations. One of the cases being examined involves Christine Baker, who died at the age of 59 in 2015 following advice from Paterson to undergo a “skin-sparing” mastectomy in 2005. Despite claims that he may not have completely removed Mrs. Baker’s tumor, Paterson defended his actions, stating he advocated for the treatment she wanted.

Testifying via video link, Jewkes stated that Paterson’s surgical practices were considered oncologically risky and went against established procedures. He highlighted concerns about rumors surrounding Paterson leaving tissue behind during operations. Jewkes mentioned that Paterson was seen as a loner who did not work well within the team, and there were grumblings about his behavior before investigations were launched.

Mrs. Baker’s husband informed the inquest that they were unaware of the concerns surrounding Paterson during her treatment and believed he was the best surgeon available. Despite being convicted in 2017 and serving his sentence, the inquests into Paterson’s conduct continue. Paterson, originally from Glasgow, practiced as a consultant surgeon at Solihull Hospital until May 2011, also working in the private sector at Spire Parkway and Spire Little Aston hospitals.

The inquest has shed light on the controversial practices of Ian Paterson, raising questions about patient safety and the regulation of medical professionals. The testimony from colleagues and patients demonstrates the importance of transparency and accountability within the healthcare system. It serves as a sobering reminder of the trust placed in healthcare professionals and the need for robust oversight to protect patients from harm.