John Swinney slams Tory debate on free bus travel for asylum seekers in Scotland

John Swinney, the First Minister of Scotland, has strongly criticised the Conservative Party’s opposition to providing free bus travel for asylum seekers in Scotland. The debate, led by Tories at Holyrood, questioned the subsidy for refugees to travel for free, a policy supported by other parties. The SNP Finance Secretary, Shona Robison, announced in the recent Budget a £2m initiative to allow asylum seekers to ride buses without charge, similar to the benefits enjoyed by senior citizens and young people in Scotland.

Swinney expressed his disappointment, highlighting the long-standing support that the Scottish Parliament has shown towards asylum seekers during its 25-year history. He noted this opposition as a departure from the unity and inclusivity that the Parliament has demonstrated in the past. The First Minister emphasised the importance of fostering a harmonious and cooperative society, where individuals from all backgrounds can live together peacefully.

The Church of Scotland and the Scottish Catholic Church have come together to urge MSPs to back the free bus travel scheme, emphasizing the need to support those seeking sanctuary and new beginnings in Scotland. However, Tory finance spokesman Craig Hoy, leading the opposition, argued that the government’s priorities are out of touch with the public, suggesting that the funds allocated for free bus travel could be better spent on other initiatives, such as winter fuel payments for pensioners.

In response, the Scottish Greens accused the Tories of stoking division for political gain, particularly in light of the upcoming 2026 Holyrood election. The debate has sparked a larger conversation around immigration policies and the treatment of asylum seekers in Scotland, with different parties taking contrasting stances on the issue.

As the discussion unfolds at Holyrood, the outcome remains uncertain, but the clash of opinions has highlighted deep divisions within Scottish politics around supporting vulnerable populations and allocating resources effectively. The protection and integration of asylum seekers continue to be significant topics within the national dialogue, reflecting broader societal attitudes towards inclusivity and compassion.

In conclusion, the debate on free bus travel for asylum seekers in Scotland underscores the complexities of immigration policy and the ongoing efforts to create a welcoming and supportive environment for all individuals seeking refuge in the country. The differing perspectives presented by political parties and advocacy groups showcase the diverse range of opinions on how best to address the needs of vulnerable populations and promote social cohesion. Ultimately, the outcome of this debate will not only impact asylum seekers’ access to essential services but also shape the broader narrative around diversity and inclusion in Scottish society.