Mum of Isla Bryson hits back as she refutes trans rapist over claims they wanted to be a girl from age 4

Mum of Isla Bryson responds to claims made by a transgender double rapist, refuting the assertion that they wanted to be a girl from age 4. Janet Bryson is supporting a legal challenge against the Scottish Government regarding the definition of a woman, stating that only biology can confirm a person’s sex. The challenge is in response to Scottish Government guidance allowing male-born transgender women with a gender recognition certificate to hold women-only positions on company boards.

Janet, whose son was previously known as Adam Graham before identifying as Isla, expressed her belief that being female is determined by biology and not by clothing or makeup. She denied the rapist’s claims of wanting to be a girl from a young age, stating that her child never showed any inclination towards being a girl while growing up.

The case of Bryson, who was initially sent to a female jail before being transferred to an all-male prison, sparked controversy over the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill and contributed to political resignations. Susan Smith from For Women Scotland emphasized the need for politicians to address the real-world implications of the current legislation.

Janet Bryson, a rape survivor herself, shared her trauma over her son’s conviction and revealed that she has not been in contact with him for the past eight years. Isla Bryson was convicted of raping women in Clydebank and Drumchapel and sentenced to jail. The legal battle surrounding gender recognition and women’s rights continues to be a contentious issue in Scotland.

In Summary, the article highlights the complexities surrounding gender recognition and women’s rights in Scotland, with Janet Bryson’s personal story adding a poignant perspective to the ongoing debate. The legal challenge against the Scottish Government underscores the need for a thorough examination of how gender is defined and acknowledged in society. Janet Bryson’s steadfast support for women’s rights advocacy in the face of personal turmoil exemplifies the complex intersections of identity, law, and morality in contemporary discourse.