Scottish Lib Dems label plans to gradually increase smoking age limit as ‘patently ridiculous’

Scottish Liberal Democrats at Odds with UK Government Over Smoking Age Plans

At the recent Scottish Liberal Democrats’ conference, a motion was passed to oppose the UK Government’s plans to gradually increase the age at which people can buy tobacco. The party described the proposals as “patently ridiculous” and raised concerns about potential state intervention. While the UK Government, led by Sir Keir Starmer, intends to move forward with the plans supported by health campaigners and charities, the Scottish Liberal Democrats have taken a firm stance against the introduction of an escalating age limit.

The Tobacco and Vapes Bill aims to raise the age at which tobacco can be purchased, ensuring that future generations will never legally be able to smoke. This legislation would mean that individuals born after January 1, 2009, would be prohibited from purchasing tobacco as the age limit increases over time. Alex Cole-Hamilton, the leader of the Scottish Liberal Democrats, criticised the proposed rolling age ban, calling it “crackers” and highlighting concerns about creating different tiers of rights among adults.

During the conference, various party members expressed their views on the issue. Adam Harley, a Liberal Democrat candidate in the 2024 general election, warned about the potential consequences of limiting adults’ choice to smoke. Activist Jenny Marr emphasised the importance of individual freedom and decision-making, stating that people should be able to make choices about their own health behaviours without excessive state intervention. GP Drummond Begg added that the right to choose, even if it leads to harmful decisions, is fundamental in a liberal society.

Despite some members supporting further restrictions on smoking outdoors, the conference ultimately voted against the introduction of an escalating age limit for tobacco purchases. The debate highlighted differing opinions within the party regarding public health, individual liberties, and government intervention in personal choices.

In a society where public health concerns often intersect with personal freedoms, the discussion around increasing the smoking age limit raises important questions about the balance between government regulation and individual autonomy. While health advocates stress the need to protect public health and prevent smoking-related harm, others argue for the preservation of individual rights and decision-making autonomy. As this debate continues, finding a middle ground that prioritises both public health and personal freedoms remains a complex and ongoing challenge.