Physicist Claims He Has Located God. The Problem Is God Is 439 Billion Trillion Kilometers Away

For as long as humans have been able to look up at the sky, we have searched for meaning in what we see above us. Ancient civilizations built myths around the stars, early astronomers tried to map the heavens, and modern scientists now peer billions of years into the past using powerful telescopes. Yet despite all that progress, some questions remain stubbornly unanswered. Where did everything come from. What lies beyond the limits of what we can observe. And is there something greater than us embedded somewhere in the vastness of the universe. These questions sit at the uncomfortable crossroads of science, philosophy, and faith, and every so often they collide in ways that capture public attention.

That collision resurfaced recently after a former Harvard physicist made a claim that sounds like science fiction but is rooted in a mix of real cosmology and personal belief. Dr Michael Guillén has argued that God may have a physical location within the universe, not as a metaphor but tied to a real boundary described by modern physics. The problem for anyone hoping to verify this idea is distance. According to Guillén, that location would be roughly 439 billion trillion kilometers away from Earth. He is clear that this is not accepted science and that his idea is speculative, yet the claim has sparked widespread debate because it attempts to use the language of physics to address one of humanity’s oldest religious questions.

A Physicist Crossing the Line Between Science and Belief

Dr Michael Guillén is trained as both a physicist and a mathematician, with academic credentials that lend immediate weight to anything he says about the universe. Over the years, he has also become known for communicating complex scientific ideas to the public in accessible ways. In a piece written for Fox News, Guillén stepped beyond traditional scientific explanation and into theological territory by proposing that God could exist at a specific boundary of the universe. Rather than presenting this as a proven conclusion, he framed it as a speculative idea inspired by both modern cosmology and biblical scripture.

Guillén openly acknowledges that his argument does not meet the standards of empirical science. There are no experiments that could confirm it, no observations that could prove it true. Instead, he draws parallels between what science says about the limits of the universe and what the Bible says about heaven. This kind of blending immediately places his work outside mainstream physics, but it also places it within a long tradition of thinkers attempting to reconcile religious belief with scientific understanding.

What gives Guillén’s claim its viral appeal is not its scientific strength, but its ambition. By attempting to assign a cosmic address to God, he gives shape to something that is usually understood as beyond space and time. For supporters, this feels like a meaningful bridge between faith and science. For critics, it is exactly where the reasoning breaks down, because science depends on clear definitions and testable claims.

The Limits of What We Can See in the Universe

To understand Guillén’s argument, it is important to first understand the basic idea that there is a limit to how much of the universe we can observe. Light does not travel instantly. It takes time to move across space, which means when we look at distant galaxies, we are seeing them as they were long ago. Some objects are so far away that their light has not yet reached Earth at all.

This creates what scientists call the observable universe. It is not the entirety of existence, but rather the portion of the universe that is visible to us from our position in space and time. Beyond this region, there is almost certainly more universe, but it remains hidden because its light has not had enough time to reach us.

If the universe were static and unchanging, this limit would slowly expand. As time passed, more light would arrive, and we would gradually see farther and farther into space. Eventually, the rest of the universe would become visible. However, this is not how our universe behaves, and that difference is crucial to Guillén’s claim.

Expansion, Distance, and the Cosmic Horizon

The universe is expanding, and this expansion has been confirmed by decades of astronomical observation. Galaxies are moving away from one another, and the farther away a galaxy is, the faster it appears to recede. This relationship is described by Hubble’s law and is a fundamental part of modern cosmology.

Because space itself is expanding, there comes a point where distant galaxies are moving away from us faster than light can travel through the space between us. This does not violate the laws of physics, because it is space that is expanding, not objects moving through space. At this distance, light emitted today will never reach Earth, no matter how long we wait.

This distance marks what is known as the cosmic horizon. Guillén describes it this way: “Theoretically, a galaxy that’s 273 billion trillion (273,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) miles away from Earth would move at 186,000 miles per second, which is the speed of light. That distance, way ‘up’ there in space, is called the Cosmic Horizon.” Light from beyond this boundary is permanently inaccessible to us, making it one of the most mysterious features of the universe.

Linking the Cosmic Horizon to Heaven

Guillén sees a connection between this cosmic horizon and biblical descriptions of heaven. In Christian scripture, heaven is portrayed as a realm that living humans cannot access and one that is inhabited by immortal, non-material beings. Guillén argues that the cosmic horizon shares these characteristics, as it represents a region of the universe that we can never physically reach or observe directly.

He goes further by suggesting that time itself stops at the cosmic horizon. Guillén writes, “Our best astronomical observations and Einstein’s theories of special and general relativity indicate that time stops at the Cosmic Horizon. At that special distance, way ‘up’ there in deep, deep, deep space, there is no past, present or future. There’s only timelessness.” This idea is central to his argument, as it allows him to frame the horizon as a realm fundamentally different from the universe we experience.

He continues by adding, “Unlike time, however, space does exist at and beyond the Cosmic Horizon. Which means the hidden universe beyond the Cosmic Horizon is habitable, albeit only by light and light-like entities.” These statements form the basis of his claim that God, described in the Bible as non-material and eternal, could exist in such a region.

Why Scientists Strongly Disagree

Despite the poetic appeal of Guillén’s idea, cosmologists argue that it is based on a misunderstanding of how cosmic horizons work. Time does not stop at the cosmic horizon. Events beyond that boundary continue just as they do everywhere else in the universe. The reason we cannot observe them is not because time freezes, but because the light carrying information about those events can never reach us.

What Guillén interprets as time stopping is actually an observational effect caused by redshift. As light travels through expanding space, its wavelength stretches, making distant events appear slower from our perspective. This does not mean that those events are actually slowing down or coming to a halt.

Scientists often explain this with a simple thought experiment. If an observer were located at our cosmic horizon and looked back toward Earth, life on Earth might appear slowed or even frozen. Yet here we are, continuing our daily routines, completely unaffected. This shows that the cosmic horizon is not a physical place where time behaves differently, but a boundary defined by perspective.

The Problem With Treating a Boundary as a Location

One of the biggest issues with Guillén’s argument is that it treats an observational boundary as though it were a physical destination. The cosmic horizon is not a place that can be visited, occupied, or pointed to on a map of the universe. It exists because of the relationship between time, light, and expansion, not because it is a unique region of space.

Every observer in the universe has their own cosmic horizon. From somewhere else in the cosmos, Earth itself lies beyond an observational boundary for distant civilizations. That fact alone highlights why the horizon cannot logically be considered a special or divine location.

Beyond being unimaginably far away, there is no physical reason to associate God with this boundary. The idea works as metaphor, but it breaks down when treated as literal cosmology.

Why the Idea Still Resonates With People

Despite widespread scientific criticism, Guillén’s claim continues to circulate because it speaks to something deeply human. People are drawn to ideas that connect hard science with questions of meaning and purpose. The cosmic horizon is mysterious, unreachable, and humbling, which makes it an easy place to project spiritual significance.

For some readers, the idea feels reassuring because it suggests that science leaves room for God. For others, it serves as a reminder of how easily complex scientific ideas can be misunderstood or oversimplified when removed from their proper context. Either way, the reaction shows how eager people are to bridge the gap between what we can measure and what we believe.

Speculation like this is not inherently harmful, but it becomes problematic when it is mistaken for scientific conclusion rather than personal interpretation. Clear distinctions matter, especially when dealing with concepts as complex as cosmology.

A Reflection on Science, Faith, and Limits

Guillén’s claim does not prove the existence of God, nor does it disprove it. What it does is highlight the limits of scientific knowledge and the discomfort those limits can create. There are parts of the universe we will never observe and questions we may never answer using measurement alone.

The real issue arises when observational limits are treated as cosmic truths. Science explains how the universe behaves. Faith and philosophy explore why we exist within it. When those roles blur, confusion follows.

In the end, the cosmic horizon is not a divine residence. It is a reminder of how small our window into the universe truly is, and how much remains unknown. Perhaps that sense of humility, more than any calculated distance, is what keeps humanity looking upward and asking questions that refuse to fade away.