Your cart is currently empty!
Fish Suffer up to 22 Minutes of Intense Pain When Taken Out of Water
Every year, approximately one trillion fish are caught from the water worldwide, primarily destined for human consumption. While most people understand this isn’t exactly pleasant for the animals involved, few have considered the specific mechanics of what happens during those final moments. Until now, the experience remained largely unquantified, a gap in our understanding that obscured the actual cost of our dietary choices.
Contents
show
Scientists have recently developed a breakthrough method for measuring something previously impossible to assess: the precise intensity and duration of animal suffering. When researchers applied this revolutionary framework to one of the world’s most common food fish, they discovered numbers that have stunned even seasoned marine biologists and animal welfare experts.
What they found challenges assumptions about consciousness, pain perception, and the methods we use to harvest billions of aquatic animals each year. Behind the clinical language of their research lies a sobering reality that could fundamentally change how we think about seafood production and consumption.
Numbers That Will Change How You Think About Seafood
View this post on Instagram
An international team of biologists, led by Cynthia Schuck-Paim from the Welfare Footprint Institute, has accomplished what many considered impossible: quantifying the subjective experience of animal suffering using standardized, scientifically rigorous methods. Their target was rainbow trout, a species chosen for its global importance in aquaculture and the extensive research available on its neurophysiology.
Using the newly developed Welfare Footprint Framework, researchers created a detailed timeline of what fish experience when removed from water, the most common method of killing fish commercially. Rather than relying on assumptions or anthropomorphic projections, they analyzed behavioral indicators, neurophysiological measurements, and responses to pain-relieving medications.
“Societal concern about the impacts of production practices on animal welfare is rising, as evidenced by consumer-driven movements, labelling efforts, accreditation schemes, policies and legislation that prioritize animal welfare,” the study authors note, highlighting the urgent need for quantifiable welfare metrics.
Rainbow trout, originally from Pacific Ocean tributaries but now farmed on every continent except Antarctica, typically die by asphyxiation in open air or ice water. While cost-effective for mass production, this method enables researchers to measure an experience with unprecedented precision.
Five Seconds to Terror: When Gills Collapse
Within mere seconds of air exposure, fish undergo dramatic physiological changes that trigger what researchers classify as an emergency response. Delicate gill structures, designed to extract oxygen from water, immediately collapse and adhere to each other when exposed to air, cutting off the animal’s primary means of respiration.
Behavioral observations reveal vigorous twisting, turning, and escape attempts that begin almost instantly upon removal from water. Scientists have documented that even five seconds of air exposure triggers neurochemical responses associated with negative emotions, suggesting that fish immediately recognize their dire situation.
Carbon dioxide from normal cellular respiration, which would typically be expelled through functional gills, begins accumulating in the fish’s bloodstream. What starts as a manageable waste product quickly becomes a toxic buildup that will drive the cascade of suffering documented by researchers.
Air exposure ranks as the most severe stressor fish can experience, capable of causing hydromineral disturbance within timeframes that would require significantly more prolonged exposure to other stressors, such as crowding or handling.
Drowning in Air: When CO2 Becomes Poison
As CO2 levels rise in the fish’s blood, a process called hypercapnia begins—one of the most distressing experiences any vertebrate can endure. Carbon dioxide combines with water in the bloodstream to form carbonic acid, which rapidly acidifies the blood and triggers the body’s most primitive alarm systems.
Fish possess CO2-sensitive receptors that respond to noxious chemicals, meaning hypercapnia directly stimulates pain pathways. Research has demonstrated that CO2-induced behavioral effects in fish can be reduced using analgesics, providing strong evidence that this process causes genuine pain rather than mere physiological dysfunction.
“When standardized by production output, this corresponds to an average of 24 minutes per kilogram, with over one hour of moderate to extreme pain per kilogram in some cases,” researchers calculated, translating individual suffering into production metrics that reveal the scope of the problem.
Rising CO2 levels create an increasingly desperate urge to breathe—a sensation familiar to anyone who has held their breath too long, but extended over many minutes without possibility of relief. Fish exhibit vigorous behavioral reactions, including escape attempts and gasping, as CO2 concentrations rise beyond tolerable levels.
24 Minutes of Hell Per Kilogram on Your Plate
Using their standardized framework, researchers identified four distinct categories of pain intensity: Annoying, Hurtful, Disabling, and Excruciating. Most of the fish’s experience during air asphyxiation falls into the two most severe categories, representing pain levels that would require strong analgesics for relief in medical settings.
Individual fish endure between 2 and 25 minutes of moderate to extreme pain, depending on their size and environmental conditions. Larger fish and colder temperatures extend the duration of suffering, as metabolic processes slow and the time to unconsciousness increases.
When converted to production metrics that reflect real-world fishing and farming operations, these numbers become even more striking. An average of 24 minutes of intense pain per kilogram of fish produced means that a typical restaurant serving could represent hours of animal suffering.
Some cases exceed one hour of moderate to extreme pain per kilogram, particularly when larger fish are slaughtered under suboptimal conditions. Such figures challenge common assumptions about fish consciousness and pain perception that have historically justified current slaughter methods.
Cracking the Code of Silent Screams
Quantifying subjective experiences, such as pain, requires a sophisticated methodology that acknowledges both scientific uncertainty and natural variation among individuals. Researchers developed probability-based assessments that assign likelihood percentages to different pain intensities rather than forcing arbitrary assignments to single categories.
Evidence evaluation considered multiple research lines, including behavioral indicators such as escape attempts and body contortions, neurophysiological measures like brain activity patterns, and pharmacological responses to pain-relieving drugs. Each piece of evidence was rated for consistency with defined intensity criteria.
For example, observations of “intensive aversive reactions, including vigorous movements of twisting and turning and escape attempts” indicated maximal emergency responses consistent with the most severe pain categories. However, researchers acknowledged uncertainty by maintaining probability distributions rather than absolute classifications.
“Our findings provide the first quantitative estimates of pain during fish slaughter, demonstrating the potential scale of welfare improvements achievable through effective stunning methods,” the team concluded, emphasizing the practical applications of their measurement framework.
Why Air Is a Fish’s Worst Enemy
Research consistently demonstrates that air exposure represents the most severe stressor fish can experience, exceeding the impact of crowding, handling, temperature changes, or other standard commercial practices. Even brief exposures create lasting behavioral changes, with fish showing persistent avoidance of locations associated with air exposure.
Evolutionary pressure has shaped fish to experience air exposure as intensely unpleasant because even short periods pose direct threats to survival. Such intense negative responses drive immediate escape behaviors that could mean the difference between life and death in natural environments where accidental stranding might occur.
Neurochemical studies reveal that air exposure triggers expression of stress-related molecules in brain regions homologous to those involved in aversion processing in mammals. Brief air exposure leads to the suppression of coping mechanisms in fish brains, resulting in impaired expression of proteins typically involved in stress management.
Carbon Dioxide: Nature’s Panic Button
Hypercapnia doesn’t just impair breathing—it actively stimulates pain pathways and triggers anxiety responses documented across vertebrate species. As blood pH drops due to the formation of carbonic acid, acid-sensing ion channels in neurons become activated, potentially increasing sensitivity to all sensory stimuli, including pain.
Research demonstrates that hypercapnia releases catecholamines proportional to acidosis severity, and these same chemical signals trigger panic attacks in humans. CO2 exposure also disrupts GABA receptors, inhibitory neurotransmitters that usually control nerve cell hyperactivity associated with anxiety, stress, and fear.
Fish exposed to elevated CO2 show increased anxiety-like behaviors that reverse when returned to customary conditions, proving the causative relationship between CO2 exposure and psychological distress. CO2 has become so reliably aversive that researchers use it as a non-physical barrier to control fish movement in experimental settings.
Exhausted but Still Conscious and Suffering
As oxygen deprivation continues, fish switch to anaerobic metabolism—a less efficient energy production method that rapidly depletes glycogen stores and increases lactate accumulation. Rising lactate levels further acidify blood while inhibiting key enzymes involved in energy production.
Physical activity gradually decreases as metabolic exhaustion sets in, but consciousness typically persists well beyond the cessation of vigorous movement. Many observers mistakenly interpret reduced activity as evidence of unconsciousness, when fish may still experience pain from ongoing hypercapnia, acidosis, and ischemia.
An insufficient oxygen supply to tissues creates ischemic pain, while triggering the release of inflammatory mediators that amplify pain signals. Lactate accumulation itself becomes a source of discomfort, creating multiple simultaneous pain sources during the final phases of asphyxiation.
“Humane” Stunning Often Fails Miserably
While electrical and percussive stunning methods offer theoretical alternatives to air asphyxiation, real-world implementation often fails to achieve consistent unconsciousness. Brain scan studies reveal that electrical stunning frequently produces variable results, with many fish remaining conscious despite appearing immobilized.
Equipment failures, worker fatigue, and improper positioning compromise the effectiveness of stunning methods in commercial settings. Even when correctly applied, stunning duration may not persist until death, meaning fish could regain consciousness during subsequent processing steps.
Ice slurry methods, sometimes promoted as humane alternatives, may extend the duration of suffering for cold-water species like rainbow trout. Rather than inducing rapid unconsciousness, cold exposure introduces additional stressors, including thermal shock, tissue damage from ice crystals, and physical pressure.
Three Percent Price Hike Could Save Hours of Agony
Cost-effectiveness modeling reveals that electrical stunning could prevent 60 to 1,200 minutes of moderate to extreme pain per dollar of capital investment, assuming effectiveness rates of 70-100%. Implementation would increase ex-farm prices by approximately 3%, representing a modest cost for substantial welfare improvements.
However, these theoretical benefits depend entirely on consistent, effective implementation—something current evidence suggests remains challenging in commercial operations. Continued development of stunning technologies, implementation protocols, and worker training programs will be necessary to realize potential welfare gains.
Investment in humane slaughter methods becomes even more compelling when considering the global scale of fish production. With billions of fish killed annually, even minor percentage improvements in stunning effectiveness could prevent enormous amounts of suffering.
What This Means for Consumers and Policymakers
Quantified welfare metrics enable evidence-based decision-making that was previously impossible when animal suffering remained unmeasurable. Producers can now compare potential practice improvements using concrete data, while policymakers can design regulations based on scientific evidence rather than assumptions.
Certification programs can establish objective standards for welfare, enabling consumers to make informed choices about seafood purchases based on transparent data about the welfare impact. Such metrics allow meaningful comparisons between production methods and species.
“With over a trillion fish slaughtered annually, they also demonstrate the potential scale of welfare improvements achievable with effective stunning methods,” researchers emphasize, highlighting both the challenge and opportunity facing the seafood industry.