Your cart is currently empty!
Man had his body frozen and flown over 3,750 miles to US in hope of waking up in the future

Throughout history, humanity has been fascinated by the idea of outsmarting death. From ancient myths of immortality to modern-day biohacking, the desire to extend life has driven countless efforts. But while most approaches focus on slowing the aging process or delaying the inevitable, cryonics takes a different path—one that literally freezes time. This controversial procedure involves preserving a person’s body at sub-zero temperatures, with the hope that future advancements in science could someday reverse death itself.
In a recent story that captured global attention, an anonymous British man took this extraordinary leap of faith. After his passing, his body was prepared in London and flown more than 3,750 miles across the Atlantic to the United States, where it was placed in cryonic suspension at the Cryonics Institute (CI). His frozen body now rests alongside over 250 other individuals who share a common hope: that one day, technology will advance far enough to bring them back to life. While the science behind this is speculative, the promise of a second chance at life is what fuels this daring gamble, sparking curiosity and debate about what the future might hold.
The Science Behind Cryonics
Cryonics might sound like something straight out of science fiction, but the underlying science is both real and meticulously planned. At its core, cryonics is the process of preserving a deceased body at extremely low temperatures in hopes that future medical advancements could restore life. The theory hinges on the belief that death, as we understand it today, is more of a temporary condition—a state that may one day be reversible with advanced technology.
The bodies are stored in liquid nitrogen, which keeps them at a chilling -320.8°F (-196°C). This ultra-cold environment essentially “pauses” the body in time, preventing further decay. The Cryonics Institute (CI), one of the most well-known facilities for this procedure, currently houses more than 250 patients in its Michigan location. These individuals, like the anonymous Brit, have been preserved in special tanks called cryostats, where they will remain frozen indefinitely until—if and when—science discovers a way to revive them.
Though the process may sound cutting-edge, it’s still highly speculative. Critics argue that, while freezing a body may halt physical deterioration, the complexities of the human brain present a far greater challenge. Nevertheless, cryonics proponents believe it’s a calculated risk, offering at least the potential for life to be restored, as opposed to the certainty of death through traditional burial or cremation.
Man’s Journey Across Continents
The journey this man took after death was anything but ordinary. Upon his passing in London, a carefully orchestrated process began to ensure his body was preserved in the best possible condition for its final destination—the Cryonics Institute in Michigan, USA. His body was first packed in dry ice at a funeral home, which slowed the onset of decomposition and prepared it for the transatlantic trip.
Once stabilized, his body embarked on a 3,750-mile journey across the Atlantic Ocean. This long and complex process had to be executed with precision. Cryonics isn’t just about freezing a body; it’s about maintaining the biological integrity needed for future revival. Any misstep in timing or temperature control could compromise the preservation process and dash the hopes of revival.
When the body finally arrived at the Cryonics Institute, it was placed in a cryostat—an insulated tank filled with liquid nitrogen, which brings the body down to an astonishing -320.8°F. At this point, the body is frozen indefinitely, suspended in a state where no further biological decay can take place. The man became the 254th patient at the facility, joining others who share the same hope for a future where the boundaries of life and death are no longer fixed.
This remarkable journey across continents symbolizes more than just a transfer of a body—it represents the lengths people are willing to go in pursuit of a second chance at life, no matter how uncertain the outcome.

The Hope for a Second Life
For many, cryonics represents more than just a scientific experiment—it’s a symbol of hope. The patients preserved at the Cryonics Institute, including the anonymous Brit, believe that future advancements in medical technology might one day bring them back to life. This hope stems from the rapid progress seen in other areas of science. What once seemed impossible—like heart transplants or artificial organs—are now routine medical procedures. Proponents of cryonics believe the same could happen with reviving those who have been preserved.
The concept is simple: by freezing their bodies at the moment of death, patients are essentially betting that one day, medical science will be able to cure whatever condition caused their death in the first place. This could involve advanced regeneration of tissues, organs, and even brain cells. The idea that technology might reverse death is what drives many to invest in this speculative procedure.
For example, the longest-preserved patient at the Cryonics Institute is Rhea Ettinger, who has been in cryonic suspension since 1977. Her case, along with the growing number of patients joining the institute, speaks to the enduring belief that cryonics is the ultimate gamble for a second chance at life. People like Rhea, and now the anonymous Brit, cling to the possibility that future generations will possess the knowledge and tools to bring them back from the brink.
Though skeptics remain unconvinced, the growing interest in cryonics shows that this hope for a future beyond death is only gaining momentum. It’s not just about scientific curiosity—it’s about the deeply human desire to continue living, even if it means waiting decades or even centuries in a frozen state.
Why People Take the Gamble (Pascal’s Wager)
The decision to undergo cryonics is often seen as a gamble—a bet on the future with the potential for enormous gains but little to lose. This mindset is sometimes likened to Pascal’s Wager, a philosophical argument proposed by Blaise Pascal. The argument suggests that when faced with uncertainty, it’s rational to wager on an outcome that offers a potential benefit far greater than the risk. In the case of cryonics, that benefit is the possibility of future revival, while the risk is simply the natural fate of death.
Dennis Kowalski, the president of the Cryonics Institute, echoes this belief, stating that while cryonics doesn’t guarantee life, it’s a calculated risk worth taking. As Kowalski puts it, if you choose burial or cremation, your chances of coming back are zero. Cryonics, on the other hand, offers at least some possibility—however slim—that technological advancements might one day bring patients back to life.
This philosophy is what draws many people to cryonics. They see it as a rational decision: if the future holds even the slightest chance of reversing death, why not take that leap? Proponents often compare the skepticism surrounding cryonics to the doubts once cast on heart transplants or life support systems. What once seemed impossible is now a routine part of modern medicine, so who’s to say that reviving a cryonically preserved body won’t one day be possible?
Of course, this approach isn’t without controversy. Critics argue that cryonics is more of a science fiction fantasy than a realistic medical solution. But for those willing to take the gamble, it represents the ultimate backup plan—an ambulance ride to a hospital that might exist in the future, offering a chance at life that they otherwise wouldn’t have.
A Controversial Path
While the idea of cryonics is tantalizing to some, it has also sparked considerable debate and criticism. One of the most vocal critics is Dr. Miriam Stoppard, a well-known journalist and physician, who argues that cryonics robs people of their dignity in death. To her, the process of freezing a body and placing hope in an uncertain future strips away the natural closure that death is supposed to bring. Others share similar concerns, viewing cryonics as an extreme, even desperate, measure taken by those unwilling to accept the finality of life.
Many skeptics also point to the lack of concrete scientific evidence that cryonics could ever lead to revival. They argue that while cryonics may preserve the physical structure of the body, the intricacies of the brain—particularly memories and consciousness—pose a much more complex challenge. Once these neural connections deteriorate, they may be impossible to restore, leaving only an empty shell behind.
Despite these concerns, the number of people choosing cryonics continues to rise. For those who sign up, the idea of cryonics isn’t about defying nature, but about seizing a potential opportunity. They see it as an extension of the human spirit’s refusal to give up, even in the face of overwhelming odds. The practice, while controversial, taps into a primal human desire—to survive, to live longer, to see what the future holds.
The ethical debate surrounding cryonics is unlikely to be settled anytime soon. But as more people take this path, it raises thought-provoking questions about the limits of science, the meaning of life, and what it truly means to die.