John Swinney warns double jobbing ‘very demanding’ as First Minister weighs in on Stephen Flynn row

John Swinney, the Deputy Political Editor of the Daily Record, has issued a warning about the challenges of double jobbing, as the First Minister also weighed in on a brewing row within the SNP. The controversy surrounds Stephen Flynn, the Nationalist leader at Westminster, who received criticism after announcing his intention to stand for election to Holyrood in 2026 while retaining his Commons seat. Ivan McKee, a colleague of Swinney, had previously commented that holding dual roles as an MSP and MP was not sustainable, indirectly referencing Flynn’s decision.

Swinney acknowledged the demanding nature of juggling responsibilities in both parliaments, highlighting the practical difficulties involved. Despite the backlash towards Flynn within the party, Swinney praised him as a valuable contributor and one of the SNP’s standout figures. He emphasized that the decision ultimately rested with Flynn and the party members as they proceed with the candidate selection process.

McKee also commended Flynn’s talent but expressed reservations about the feasibility of maintaining dual roles as an MP and an MSP, stressing the need for full-time commitment to parliamentary duties. The SNP had previously imposed a rule before the 2021 Holyrood election to prevent MPs from concurrently holding seats in both parliaments, a move widely perceived as targeting certain individuals critical of party leadership.

The party’s national executive committee is expected to review this policy ahead of the 2026 election, underscoring the ongoing debate within the SNP regarding dual mandates. While tensions persist over Flynn’s plans, Swinney affirmed his commitment to unifying the party despite internal challenges. The discussions surrounding double jobbing and party rules reflect the intricate dynamics shaping the SNP’s political landscape.

In conclusion, the article sheds light on the complexities and divisions within the SNP as key figures navigate the intricacies of holding dual parliamentary roles. The contrasting perspectives of Swinney and McKee underscore the deliberations surrounding this issue and its implications for party cohesion and governance. As the SNP grapples with internal dissent and policy considerations, the unfolding developments may influence the party’s direction and future leadership dynamics.