Donald Trump shares wild conspiracy theory that Joe Biden was ‘executed’ and replaced by a clone


In the ever-evolving intersection of politics, media, and public trust, the line between political commentary and conspiracy has become increasingly blurred. This past weekend, former President Donald Trump reignited controversy after reposting a baseless and deeply outlandish claim that President Joe Biden had been “executed” and replaced by a robotic or cloned double. The post, originally published by an obscure Truth Social user known for fringe content, was devoid of evidence or credible sources. Yet, Trump’s decision to share it with millions of followers served as a reminder of how misinformation can be propelled into national discourse with a single click.

Though the claim itself may seem too implausible to warrant serious consideration, its amplification by a former head of state raises important questions about the normalization of misinformation, the responsibilities of public figures, and the increasingly volatile media ecosystem that allows falsehoods to flourish. This story is not just about one conspiracy theory; it is a case study in how digital platforms, political strategy, and media culture intersect to influence public perception — often at the expense of truth.

A New Low in Political Discourse: Trump Amplifies Clone Conspiracy Theory

Over the weekend, former President Donald Trump reposted a fringe conspiracy theory on Truth Social that alleged President Joe Biden had been “executed” in 2020 and replaced with clones or robotic doubles. The original post came from an anonymous user known for spreading outlandish and debunked claims, including language suggesting Biden had been substituted by “robotic engineered soulless mindless entities.” Although the account behind the post has only a modest following, Trump’s decision to share it with his nearly 10 million followers — without comment, clarification, or disclaimer — once again drew attention to his pattern of promoting baseless narratives to a broad audience.

This is not an isolated incident. Trump has a documented history of amplifying misinformation and conspiracy theories, many of which have been categorically disproven. From the “birther” movement targeting Barack Obama to persistent, unfounded claims that he won the 2020 election, Trump’s communication style has often relied on shock value and repetition of falsehoods to keep himself at the center of public discourse. Experts such as Harvard’s Joan Donovan have pointed out that when influential figures endorse or even casually repeat fringe theories, they lend those narratives a veneer of legitimacy that can blur the line between political rhetoric and dangerous disinformation. The fact that such an extraordinary claim — effectively a science-fiction plot — was reposted without context speaks volumes about how far the boundaries of acceptable political commentary have shifted.

Moreover, the Biden administration’s silence on the matter reflects a strategic decision not to dignify the post with a direct response, a move consistent with the White House’s general approach to unsubstantiated digital attacks. However, the larger concern remains: when discredited narratives gain traction through platforms with massive reach, they don’t just undermine individual reputations — they erode public trust in institutions, democratic processes, and the shared reality upon which civic dialogue depends. In this context, Trump’s repost cannot be dismissed as merely provocative or unserious. It exemplifies the ongoing weaponization of social media to spread distortions and sow confusion in an already polarized political environment.

The Historical Pattern: Trump’s Longstanding Relationship with Misinformation

Donald Trump’s reposting of the Biden clone theory is consistent with a broader pattern that has defined his public communication strategy for years: the amplification of conspiratorial and factually unsupported claims. From the earliest days of his political ascent, Trump has demonstrated a calculated use of misinformation, often blurring entertainment and politics to mobilize his base and dominate media cycles. Notably, he was a central figure in promoting the “birther” conspiracy about Barack Obama, which falsely claimed that the former president was not born in the United States. Despite ample documentation proving otherwise, Trump persisted with the claim for years before eventually walking it back under pressure — a move many observers considered too little, too late.

The 2020 presidential election further underscored this pattern, as Trump repeatedly pushed the falsehood that the election was stolen — a narrative that directly contributed to the January 6 Capitol insurrection. These claims, thoroughly investigated and rejected by courts, election officials, and independent audits, nonetheless persisted among Trump’s supporters in large part due to his relentless messaging. According to a 2021 Monmouth University poll, approximately one-third of Americans continued to believe that Biden’s win was the result of voter fraud, illustrating the powerful influence of repeated disinformation from a prominent figure. Trump’s unfounded accusations have since expanded beyond elections to include inflammatory assertions about immigrants, vaccines, and government institutions — including false claims that Haitian immigrants were “eating the pets” of American citizens.

Trump’s inner circle has also played a role in promoting misinformation, adding a layer of institutional complicity to the issue. Prominent allies and former officials in his administration, including those in health, intelligence, and legal roles, have publicly shared and supported various conspiracy theories. This includes misleading claims about vaccine safety, deep state plots, and the weaponization of federal agencies against Trump. When viewed collectively, these narratives don’t merely exist in the abstract — they actively shape public perception, polarize discourse, and diminish the authority of evidence-based governance. In this light, the reposting of the Biden clone theory is not a deviation but a continuation of a strategy that treats misinformation as a political tool rather than a liability.

Autopens, Health Rumors, and the Broader Campaign to Undermine Biden’s Legitimacy

Trump’s amplification of the Biden clone conspiracy comes amid a broader and sustained effort by him and his allies to cast doubt on President Biden’s mental and physical fitness, often through misleading or exaggerated claims. One example that has gained traction in right-wing circles involves Biden’s use of an autopen — a mechanical device used to replicate a person’s signature — to authorize legislation and executive orders. Trump and some House Republicans have seized on this decades-old White House practice to question whether Biden is mentally capable of carrying out his duties, with Trump even suggesting that pardons signed using the device might be invalid. Yet, the use of autopens is neither novel nor suspicious; past administrations, including those of George W. Bush and Barack Obama, also utilized the tool for routine documentation.

In parallel, Trump-aligned figures have amplified personal health rumors following Biden’s recent revelation of a metastatic prostate cancer diagnosis. While the announcement initially prompted bipartisan expressions of sympathy, the tone quickly shifted as Trump’s surrogates began implying that Biden had concealed the illness or was too frail to serve. However, Biden’s public remarks have sought to dispel those concerns — he has repeatedly stated that he feels well, even joking about his critics’ attempts to paint him as cognitively impaired. These efforts to delegitimize Biden through health speculation are not new; similar tactics have been used historically to question the vitality of aging or ailing leaders, despite medical disclosures and expert assurances.

What makes these attacks more consequential is how they are situated within a media ecosystem that thrives on viral narratives rather than verified facts. When unfounded claims about a president being replaced by a robot or invalidating laws via autopen gain traction — particularly when echoed by a former president — they shift public attention away from substantive policy debate. They also deepen skepticism among voters already inclined to distrust traditional institutions. While scrutiny of any leader is necessary in a democracy, this pattern of elevating innuendo over evidence reflects a troubling erosion of standards in political discourse, one in which credibility is too often sacrificed for sensationalism.

The Digital Megaphone: How Social Media Amplifies the Fringe

The velocity and reach of conspiracy theories in today’s media environment owe much to the dynamics of social platforms, where algorithmic amplification rewards engagement over accuracy. Truth Social, the platform where Trump now communicates most frequently, plays a pivotal role in this landscape. Designed in part as a haven for users banned or discouraged on mainstream platforms, it has become a fertile ground for fringe narratives and ideologically driven misinformation. With Trump as its most prominent user, the platform gains a unique power: even the most obscure and implausible content can receive national attention when reshared by a figure of his stature. In this case, a post by an anonymous user — whose account has a small following — was catapulted into the broader public consciousness solely because Trump reposted it.

Unlike traditional media, social platforms lack the editorial filters that once served as guardrails for public discourse. While established outlets typically apply fact-checking and standards of verification before publication, digital platforms allow unverified information to spread unchecked, often going viral before any form of correction can catch up. A 2020 study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found that false news spreads significantly faster and more broadly on Twitter than true stories — a phenomenon driven not just by bots, but by real users reacting to emotionally charged or shocking content. This environment creates a feedback loop where extreme ideas gain traction simply because they provoke strong reactions, regardless of their factual basis.

The consequences are tangible. Not only does this flow of misinformation erode trust in public institutions, it also places legitimate news outlets in a reactive position, forced to debunk and respond to content that often began as online speculation. This reactive cycle plays to the advantage of those who intentionally spread falsehoods; it creates a “both sides” narrative that can confuse audiences and muddy the waters of accountability. In the long term, the repeated exposure to untruths — especially when they come from political leaders — normalizes fringe views and makes the extraordinary seem plausible. Trump’s reposting of the Biden clone theory, while seemingly outlandish, is emblematic of how social media continues to distort the boundaries of credible political debate.

When the Absurd Becomes Strategy: The Cost of Normalizing the Unbelievable

The reposting of a bizarre and wholly unfounded conspiracy theory — that President Joe Biden was executed and replaced by robotic doubles — is not merely a digital footnote or harmless eccentricity. It is a reflection of a deliberate strategy that has reshaped the boundaries of American political discourse. When a former president with national influence amplifies such claims without accountability, it signals a deeper shift in how truth, credibility, and leadership are perceived. What was once confined to internet subcultures is now given a megaphone by political elites, blurring the line between fringe speculation and mainstream political messaging. That shift carries real consequences: it degrades the quality of civic engagement, diminishes trust in democratic institutions, and fosters an environment in which the outrageous no longer shocks but simply adds to the noise.

At the core of this phenomenon is the normalization of distortion. By flooding the public sphere with a mix of conspiracy, ridicule, and unverifiable rumor — whether through social media posts, campaign speeches, or television appearances — a figure like Trump transforms misinformation from a liability into a currency of political capital. In doing so, he not only distracts from substantive critiques and policy discussions but also exploits the attention economy, where visibility often outweighs veracity. And when a leader engages in this tactic repeatedly, it desensitizes the public, making each subsequent falsehood feel less extraordinary — and therefore less worthy of outrage.

Ultimately, the real danger is not the absurdity of the claims themselves, but the erosion of shared standards for truth and responsibility. Democracies function not just on votes, but on trust — in institutions, in facts, and in the belief that leaders will act with some measure of integrity, even in disagreement. When that trust is chipped away by sensationalism masquerading as strategy, what’s left is not healthy skepticism, but corrosive cynicism. The challenge for both media and the public is to resist treating these moments as mere spectacle, and instead recognize them as symptoms of a deeper, systemic vulnerability that demands urgent and sustained attention.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *