Your cart is currently empty!
Selena Gomez ‘Loses Over 700,000 Instagram Followers’ Over One Single Post That’s Now Deleted
Selena Gomez has long used her platform to speak out on issues she cares about, but her latest post has sparked an intense debate. The singer and actress recently shared a profoundly emotional video reacting to President Donald Trump’s new executive orders, voicing her concerns for those affected. While some praised her for showing empathy, others criticized her stance, leading to an unexpected backlash. The controversy escalated quickly, and Gomez saw a significant drop in her Instagram following in weeks. The reaction raises a familiar question: how much freedom do public figures have to express personal views without facing consequences?
Contents
show
The Emotional Video That Divided Opinions
Selena Gomez’s emotional reaction to Trump’s executive orders sparked a wave of mixed responses. With tears, she said, “I’m so sorry. All my people are getting attacked. The children, I don’t understand. I wish I could do something but I can’t. I don’t know what to do. I’ll try everything, I promise.” Her voice shook as she expressed sorrow for those affected, especially children caught in the crisis. Many saw her tears as a genuine display of compassion. Others felt differently, arguing that celebrities should take action rather than share emotional videos.
Supporters praised her for shedding light on the issue, saying her influence could raise awareness. Critics dismissed her response as performative, questioning whether posting a tearful video helped in any meaningful way. Some even suggested she was inviting backlash by stepping into a political debate.
Within hours, reactions flooded social media. Fans rallied behind her, expressing appreciation for her willingness to speak up. Detractors accused her of fueling division, arguing that politics and celebrity influence should remain separate. The divide grew sharper as discussions about her post spread across platforms.
Selena Gomez Loses Hundreds of Thousands of Followers
Selena Gomez’s Instagram following took a massive hit after she posted the emotional video. Reports estimated a loss of over 700,000 followers, a sharp drop in a short period. Facing intense scrutiny, she deleted the video and shared a brief response saying, “Apparently it’s not okay to show empathy for people.”
Critics dissected her social media presence, with some linking the decline to her stance on the executive orders. Others speculated that her audience preferred to keep entertainment separate from political opinions. Fans defended her, arguing that speaking out came with risks, especially in an era where public figures face backlash for expressing personal views.
The Backlash Grows Amid Ongoing Criticism of Gomez’s Career
The scrutiny Selena Gomez faced extended far beyond social media reactions. Her participation in the film Emilia Pérez sparked further controversy. Directed and filmed in Paris, the story is set in Mexico, which led to criticism over the choice of location and the film’s portrayal of Mexican culture. As per The Daily Mail, Paul Lenglet, co-founder and editor of CritiqueJeu, said, “Selena Gomez had a great end to 2024, but the start of 2025 has not been so gentle on her. The star has been facing many criticisms over her participation and performance on Emilia Pérez, a film directed and filmed in Paris, but with a story that takes place in Mexico.” This criticism added to the ongoing backlash from her emotional video, contributing to a challenging start for Gomez in 2025. The combination of both controversies led some to speculate that her public stance on political issues, alongside her involvement in a highly debated film, could negatively impact her public image.
How the Internet Responded
Responses to Gomez’s video ranged from admiration to skepticism. Many praised her emotional reaction, while others questioned the effectiveness of her approach
@MAimanBaig: praised Gomez for her emotional response, viewing it as a genuine display of compassion, and said, “Selena’s story is heartbreaking, and it really shows how deeply she cares. Seeing her express that kind of raw emotion over the deportations and the suffering of children is powerful. It’s clear she feels a strong sense of empathy and a desire to help. Hopefully, her platform can inspire others to take action or at least raise awareness about these injustices.”
@Victori61870630: criticized the video, arguing that tears alone won’t lead to change, and said, “There are many other ways to help, I don’t think recording yourself crying on a video will help that much. Go out and try to meet with them, fight to make them hear your voice, use your influence in a better way, crying doesn’t solve anything.”
@LeanGreenAZ pointed out a broader societal issue, expressing concern over the lack of empathy in America and saying, “The lack of empathy across America is shocking.”
The Influence of Human Activity
Climate change’s impact on ocean warming isn’t the only source of intense political debate. Immigration policies, particularly those enacted under the Trump administration, have also sparked significant discussions. Former US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) director Tom Homan, who was appointed the ‘border czar’ for the Trump administration, played a crucial role in the administration’s push to curb immigration. Homan explained how the military had been deployed to assist at the Mexican border, emphasizing what Trump said, “Sending a strong signal to the world, our borders closed.”
Homan’s statements further underlined the harsh stance on immigration, stating, “If you’re in the country illegally, you’re on the table because it’s not OK to, you know, violate the laws of this country.” He continued, “You got to remember, every time you enter this country illegally, you violated a crime under Title Eight, the United States Code 1325, it’s a crime.”
A Polarizing Moment in Celebrity Politics
Public reactions to Gomez’s video reflect a growing divide over celebrity involvement in political issues. Supporters praise her for using her platform to express concern, while critics believe entertainers should separate their personal beliefs from their public personas.
Celebrities who speak on controversial topics often face backlash, and Gomez is no exception. Some argue that her statements alienated some of her audience, leading to unfollows and criticism. Others believe that public figures are responsible for raising awareness, regardless of the consequences. The debate highlights the fine line between advocacy and public scrutiny, a challenge many in the entertainment industry continue to navigate.
The Impact of Celebrity Advocacy on Social Movements
In today’s digital age, celebrities often find themselves at the forefront of social and political movements. Whether advocating for climate change, human rights, or immigration reform, figures like Selena Gomez use their platforms to bring attention to urgent issues. Despite the risk of alienating parts of their audience, celebrities can play a critical role in mobilizing awareness, initiating discussions, and inspiring action. Historically, celebrities have been powerful agents in social movements, from Muhammad Ali’s stance on civil rights to the #MeToo movement powered by Reese Witherspoon and Alyssa Milano.
For Selena Gomez, her emotional plea for the suffering of children amid the immigration crisis brought the issue into the spotlight. While not all viewers agreed with her approach, her influence cannot be dismissed. The fact that her video sparked so much debate is a testament to celebrities’ power in shaping public opinion. While the reaction was divisive, it also catalyzed deeper conversations about how individuals in positions of power can raise awareness and foster change, even if their methods are controversial.
Selena Gomez’s experience underscores celebrities’ difficulties when using their platforms to express personal views, especially on sensitive political or social issues. Her emotional plea regarding the suffering of children and the impact of deportations touched many people, sparking empathy from those who shared her concerns. However, her public display of emotion seemed misplaced for others, with critics arguing that celebrities should avoid such controversial topics. As a result, Gomez experienced a significant loss of followers, demonstrating how her outcry alienated a portion of her audience.
This incident reflects the more significant issue celebrities face when they speak out on contentious matters. The pressure to engage with pressing social and political issues while remaining neutral enough to avoid alienating their fan base is immense. Gomez’s situation highlights the delicate balance public figures must strike: on the one hand, they have the power to influence and inspire change; on the other, their opinions can sometimes lead to a backlash that affects both their career and personal life. In navigating these tricky waters, Gomez’s experience serves as a reminder of the complexities and risks associated with using fame as a platform for advocacy.